Wetpaint CEO Ben Elowitz on the Future of Digital Media
Regular readers know that it’s only a matter of months before social becomes the most valuable source of traffic for most publishers.
And this month’s Media Industry Social Leaderboard is sure to make you even more convinced. So let me get straight to it: From November to December, the amount of traffic the top 50* publishers received from social grew by a whopping 17%.
And, when it comes to who is best benefiting from social, let’s just say I’m personally very proud to announce the new leader, which, for the sake of modesty, I’ll do lower down the page.
As noted previously, the major changes Facebook announced at September’s f8 event caused a significant blunt in traffic to publishers last fall. Well, the hangover has ended. With 385 million aggregate visits to the top 50 publishers in December, volumes have recovered to pre-f8 levels.
The average top 50 publisher is now receiving almost 8 million visits per month from Facebook and Twitter. And in December, 48 of the top 50 publishers saw increased social traffic levels over November, with these publishers averaging a 2.1 percentage point increase in their composition.
At the same time, Twitter has grown in its contribution to the traffic pie, increasing over the course of the fall months from 2.2% of total in September to 3.4% in December.

As you know from my prior columns, one of the reasons I’ve published this leaderboard is because we set a goal for Wetpaint to reach #1. What I didn’t tell you previously is the timing: our goal was to do so by the end of 2011. And there is nothing we get more proud of here at Wetpaint than meeting our goals.
In December, Wetpaint Entertainment social traffic benchmarked at 20.8% of visits, even as our total traffic was at near-record levels. (Our internal numbers show an even higher contribution.) This outranks all of the top 50 web publishers, besting the number-two by nearly five points.
Allow me a moment to kvell: I could not be more proud of the entire Wetpaint team who have achieved this goal. Beyond the amazing results, they have built an amazing social distribution system and playbook that leads the industry. With the virtuous cycle the team has built, we are getting significantly better every month.
How did the other leaders from prior months do? People, the previous leader, improved with 16.1% of traffic from social, increasing by 3.9 percentage points even as it fell to the #2 position.
In third place now, US Magazine vaulted all the way up from position 19, improving from an average 3.9% to achieve 14.3% of their traffic from social. If you have any idea what drove their results, let me know.
As for places #4 and #5, CBS and NBC traded their two slots, with NBC gaining by 4.2 percentage points while CBS gained by only 3.5 points. And all of that activity pushed MTV down to #6, gaining far slower than the others. All the details are, as usual, in the table below.
Publishers are clearly benefiting as Facebook delivers on its potential to be not just a network but a social operating system for the internet. In December, we saw the best increases go to the most social publishers (top 10 on this leaderboard), who saw a 4.5 percentage point increase in social traffic composition month to month.
Innovation is attracting large audiences on Facebook. In particular, the four publishers driving traffic via social readers have increased their share of Facebook traffic to the Top 50 web publishers by 70%. Yahoo (not included in the 4 just described) has also begun experimenting with social reader tools across select sites and is seeing strong early results as well. In just two months, Yahoo! News US has reportedly seen a 300% increase in Facebook traffic, driven by 1 million “reads” shared daily.
We are clearly in the land grab phase on the social web. Those who are investing early in social as a top objective stand to gain the most – while others may be left behind.
But as my discussions with other media companies show, social is not a simple check-box initiative. It requires complete buy-in from the CEO to transform the organization with social distribution technology and expertise.
It can be done, as our own experience at Wetpaint as shown: In less than two years, we have launched a new property and already outranked all of the top 50 publishers on the web. Now we want more. And I hope you do too.
Details for all 50 top publishers:
|
MONTHLY RANKINGS |
PUBLISHER |
|
|
||||
|
Dec |
Nov |
Oct |
Name of Publisher (Owner) |
URL |
Monthly Uniques |
% from Social |
Change |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
Wetpaint Entertainment |
WETPAINT.COM |
3,076,202 |
20.8% |
10.1% |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
People |
PEOPLE.COM |
13,203,882 |
16.1% |
3.9% |
|
3 |
21 |
19 |
US Weekly |
USMAGAZINE.COM |
9,339,801 |
14.3% |
10.4% |
|
4 |
5 |
5 |
NBC Universal |
NBC.COM |
6,972,501 |
12.3% |
4.2% |
|
5 |
4 |
4 |
CBS |
CBS.COM |
7,367,642 |
11.7% |
3.5% |
|
6 |
3 |
2 |
MTV |
MTV.COM |
9,920,294 |
10.7% |
2.1% |
|
7 |
6 |
7 |
TMZ |
TMZ.COM |
13,208,667 |
9.6% |
2.2% |
|
8 |
13 |
16 |
Break Media |
BREAK.COM |
8,603,649 |
9.4% |
4.2% |
|
9 |
8 |
6 |
Major League Baseball |
MLB.COM |
6,653,288 |
9.3% |
2.3% |
|
10 |
9 |
11 |
Patch (Aol) |
PATCH.COM |
9,917,563 |
8.7% |
2.2% |
|
11 |
14 |
12 |
Discovery Channel |
DISCOVERY.COM |
12,769,340 |
8.5% |
3.4% |
|
12 |
7 |
9 |
Yahoo! |
YAHOO.COM |
167,257,797 |
7.6% |
0.5% |
|
13 |
10 |
10 |
Aol |
AOL.COM |
50,093,953 |
7.4% |
1.1% |
|
14 |
15 |
15 |
CNN |
CNN.COM |
45,650,334 |
7.1% |
2.1% |
|
15 |
12 |
13 |
IGN (News Corp) |
IGN.COM |
10,263,828 |
6.7% |
1.4% |
|
16 |
23 |
25 |
MailOnline |
DAILYMAIL.CO.UK |
16,656,093 |
6.4% |
2.8% |
|
17 |
25 |
22 |
TIME |
TIME.COM |
9,256,468 |
6.3% |
2.7% |
|
18 |
16 |
14 |
TV Guide |
TVGUIDE.COM |
7,546,763 |
6.0% |
1.3% |
|
19 |
11 |
8 |
The Guardian |
GUARDIAN.CO.UK |
8,495,543 |
6.0% |
0.0% |
|
20 |
19 |
18 |
FOX News (News Corp) |
FOXNEWS.COM |
24,444,163 |
5.9% |
1.3% |
|
21 |
29 |
23 |
CBS News |
CBSNEWS.COM |
12,064,240 |
5.7% |
2.6% |
|
22 |
24 |
26 |
CBS Local |
CBSLOCAL.COM |
9,574,168 |
5.7% |
2.1% |
|
23 |
20 |
27 |
The Washington Post |
WASHINGTONPOST.COM |
18,671,039 |
5.5% |
1.4% |
|
24 |
18 |
17 |
MSN |
MSN.COM |
111,990,691 |
5.3% |
0.7% |
|
25 |
30 |
32 |
New York Daily News |
NYDAILYNEWS.COM |
9,585,617 |
5.1% |
2.1% |
|
26 |
17 |
20 |
BBC News |
BBC.CO.UK |
14,480,236 |
5.1% |
0.4% |
|
27 |
41 |
36 |
FORBES |
FORBES.COM |
12,232,929 |
5.0% |
3.0% |
|
28 |
26 |
31 |
The Huffington Post (Aol) |
HUFFINGTONPOST.COM |
36,196,784 |
5.0% |
1.6% |
|
29 |
31 |
28 |
New York Post |
NYPOST.COM |
8,085,270 |
4.8% |
1.8% |
|
30 |
37 |
41 |
Bleacher Report |
BLEACHERREPORT.COM |
9,178,003 |
4.7% |
2.4% |
|
31 |
22 |
21 |
New York Times |
NYTIMES.COM |
30,575,839 |
4.6% |
0.8% |
|
32 |
34 |
29 |
Cartoon Network (Turner) |
CARTOONNETWORK.COM |
10,600,092 |
4.5% |
1.7% |
|
33 |
33 |
30 |
Nickelodeon (MTV Networks) |
NICK.COM |
9,752,977 |
4.5% |
1.5% |
|
34 |
27 |
24 |
IMDB (Amazon.com) |
IMDB.COM |
38,220,405 |
4.3% |
0.9% |
|
35 |
32 |
35 |
Los Angeles Times (Tribune) |
LATIMES.COM |
17,080,642 |
4.2% |
1.2% |
|
36 |
40 |
39 |
FOX Sports (News Corp) |
FOXSPORTS.COM |
22,401,409 |
4.2% |
2.0% |
|
37 |
36 |
34 |
Food Network (Scripps) |
FOODNETWORK.COM |
19,614,352 |
3.8% |
1.2% |
|
38 |
39 |
37 |
Wall Street Journal (News Corp) |
WSJ.COM |
12,521,560 |
3.6% |
1.4% |
|
39 |
35 |
33 |
Allrecipes (Readers Digest) |
ALLRECIPES.COM |
25,288,480 |
3.5% |
0.8% |
|
40 |
45 |
42 |
CNET (CBS Interactive) |
CNET.COM |
28,948,963 |
3.1% |
1.5% |
|
41 |
38 |
38 |
Reuters |
REUTERS.COM |
11,692,493 |
3.0% |
0.7% |
|
42 |
44 |
45 |
CNBC |
CNBC.COM |
5,674,719 |
3.0% |
1.3% |
|
43 |
43 |
44 |
Bloomberg |
BLOOMBERG.COM |
7,515,601 |
2.8% |
1.1% |
|
44 |
46 |
47 |
Businessweek (Bloomberg) |
BUSINESSWEEK.COM |
7,964,543 |
2.6% |
1.0% |
|
45 |
28 |
43 |
USA Today (Gannet) |
USATODAY.COM |
17,222,775 |
2.6% |
-0.6% |
|
46 |
42 |
40 |
WebMD |
WEBMD.COM |
11,901,016 |
2.5% |
0.5% |
|
47 |
47 |
46 |
LIVESTRONG (Demand Media) |
LIVESTRONG.COM |
9,464,669 |
1.8% |
0.5% |
|
48 |
48 |
48 |
About.com (NY Times) |
ABOUT.COM |
58,684,194 |
1.6% |
0.6% |
|
49 |
50 |
50 |
eHow (Demand Media) |
EHOW.COM |
45,015,977 |
1.5% |
0.8% |
|
50 |
51 |
51 |
ThePostGame (Yahoo) |
THEPOSTGAME.COM |
18,321,581 |
1.4% |
0.8% |
|
51 |
49 |
49 |
Mayo Clinic |
MAYOCLINIC.COM |
9,198,317 |
1.4% |
0.5% |
* The publishers included in the Media Industry Social Leaderboard are the top 50, as ranked by comScore-reported uniques, whose primary business is web publishing. Once they are selected, data from Compete.com is used to estimate the amount of traffic referred to each by Facebook and Twitter.
When it comes to the emerging world of social operating systems, I’ve said before that there can be multiple winners. It’s been clear that (at least in the U.S.) LinkedIn is the dominant one for business, while Twitter serves as a backstage wire service for content producers and distributors.
Of course, we’ve all also known intuitively that Facebook has taken the lion’s share of the consumer market.
But until we ran an analysis, I didn’t realize just how extreme Facebook’s domination is when it comes to consumer usage.
How about 95%!!!
That’s on the basis of time spent by U.S. audiences on their PC’s, according to comScore data – and it signifies almost complete control of the category.
In terms of being relevant to consumer audiences, there’s now no question that “social” means “Facebook.” And, if you want to take advantage of the more than 1 in every 7 minutes of online time that consumers spend on Facebook, you follow one simple rule for media in a social age:
You must be present – in the Facebook newsfeed – to win.
Back by popular demand is an updated ranking of the Media Industry Social Leaderboard. As a reminder, my company and I are obsessively focused on data about the social web – so much so, that we decided to track and publish not only our own results, but those of the top 50 media companies. This is all captured in the chart below which profiles the top 50 web publishers’ effectiveness at driving traffic from social media.
For the inquisitive among us, you’ll note that we determine the top 50 relevant web publishers; then, using data from Compete.com, we determine and chart how much of their traffic is from Facebook and Twitter.
One important note is that Facebook’s changes in its algorithms launched at F8 impacted nearly all publishers in this ranking – more on that in a moment.
But first, let’s get to the results:
Facebook Traffic Down by 13%.
The first thing you’ll notice is that the bars are lower this month. In fact, over 90% of the top 50 web publishers saw a decreased percentage of their visits coming from Facebook and Twitter in October, with the bars shortening on average by 50 basis points.
In terms of aggregate performance, if you sum the total Facebook visits for all properties, they’re down 7.1% October vs. September, and 12.8% comparing October vs. the pre-F8 August highs. We believe this trend is the direct result of the F8 algorithm changes made in mid-September. Savvy social publishers (ourselves included) have been battling to reclaim previous highs since the F8 changes; but by October few had recovered. The chart below highlights the reduction in referrals from Facebook to publishers over the course of their algorithmic change.
Winners and Losers: CBS down; People, MTV, Wetpaint up
CBS has continued to fall in social traffic composition (-3.7% September-over-August, -5.5% Octocber-over-September), moving from the top rank on the Media Industry Social Leaderboard to number 4. Unclear what has caused this decline although one hypothesis could be an increase in either SEO or paid audience acquisition. If you have any insight here, shoot me a note.
Closer to home, People, MTV, and Wetpaint maintained their relative rankings and have moved to the top 3 spots. At Wetpaint, we credit our climb up the ladder to our relentless A/B testing that has allowed us to understand what our audience desires in a deep way, and inform our editors with this insight. The result is that we are creating, packaging, and distributing the right content, at the right time and our audience has voted with clicks, likes, and shares.
This week, we made some announcements about our achievements at Wetpaint, and it has prompted me to take a look back at 2011. It’s easy to be proud of the 6.4 million unique visitor audience we have built at Wetpaint Entertainment monthly. It is a significant accomplishment in just 15 months since we launched, and the Wetpaint team has worked passionately to get us here. But even a number like that is, well, just a number. The real value of what we did in 2011 lies in the all the learning we had about how to build, run and monetize a successful media property online.
And that learning makes me feel grateful – because as successful as we have been this year, it’s been against a context of upheaval in the industry. Media is not easy. Old formulas from print and broadcast are no longer working. And even the just-minted generation of seemingly successful digital companies, from Demand Media to Zynga to Facebook itself, are having to constantly innovate to stay on top of the wave that they’re on as they hope to catch the next.
Clearly, the most important keys to financial success in media are building audience and monetizing that audience – and we’ve made significant progress on both here at Wetpaint. Our greatest strength has been the data engine we’ve built to acquire, assimilate, and apply every possible insight about our audience. We learned that smart and targeted analysis can improve everything we do; that lots of rapid experimentation is critical; and that social traffic is far more valuable than search.
We also learned more about the Kardashians and the people on the The Bachelor/Bachelorette than anyone in this world should. Our editors did a bang-up job capturing the liveliness of the entertainment industry and they definitely deserve plenty of credit.
But while all our great content and social mojo would succeed in delighting audiences, it wouldn’t be enough to make a strong business without excellent monetization. And so I’m equally excited to note that as we get ready for 2012, we’ve found that our formula of great content and social mojo is just as valuable to advertisers as it is to our audiences. I’m pleased that we will be working with the team at Cambio Group via their joint venture between AOL, Jonas Group and MGX Lab. Together, we will be serving outstanding advertisers with some of the most innovative offerings around.
With this partnership in place, we are able to turn amazing traffic into amazing financial results. It will mean strength for our model and our company into 2012 and beyond.
But the implications are even broader for the industry, and that’s because we are setting a model that others can follow as well. And that is what I’m most excited about: What media needs most is a model that can be scaled and repeated – and our latest results make it clear we are on the right track to build it.
I’ve projected before that within the next couple of years, social can drive as much traffic as search to major media properties – especially those that are driven by real-time news. But I hadn’t expected it to happen so soon!
Yesterday was a milestone here at Wetpaint: social for the day drove over 45% of our audience visits; while search brought in about 30%.
Now consider this: Layer on the ~150% higher lifetime value of our social audience (our social users stay longer, come back more frequently, and bring additional viral referrals), and social was responsible for over 60% of the value of our audience yesterday.
It may start as an outlier, but it’s going to get more common. We are on track to be the #1 social publisher within a short time. Want to know where you stand too? Stay tuned for the updated media industry social leaderboard, which I’ll be posting in the next few days.
This article was recently published as a guest post at GeekWire, and is republished here for DigitalQuarters readers.
Since Google+ launched in June of this year, two questions have been on everyone’s mind in the digital community: 1) Can it become a huge success for Google? And 2) Can I use it to make huge success for me?
Much has been written about the first question; but very little about the second.
And so, because we’re obsessive about knowing the social Web, my colleagues and I at Wetpaint have looked long and hard at the second (and unanswered) question.
After a good deal of analysis, I can report that the answer for us as a media company (so far, at least) is “no.”
Here’s what we’ve found:
The lights are on, but no one is home – Google has been quick to point out that 40 million users have “signed up” for Google+. That’s because the product is deeply bolted onto every product inside the Google empire, including Gmail, and they did a nice job of making it easy to invite everyone you know. People checked it out, but they haven’t been back, and I’d bet their active user rates are in the single digits. Every time I log in, there’s almost zero activity among my “circles.” Even with 40 million, that pales in comparison to the reach of Facebook’s worldwide audience of 800 million (200 million in the U.S.), who are far more active (500M per day!).
Users can manage one social network, and no more – Mainstream users have demonstrated that they reach saturation after managing one social network when it comes to their personal life. First, it was Friendster; then MySpace; now Facebook. People don’t have the time and attention span to manage overlapping networks of friends and conversations.
It doesn’t solve a consumer problem – There hasn’t been a migration to Google+ because it doesn’t solve a real consumer problem. Facebook has an entrenched audience with deeply embedded habits. In order for a migration to take place, Google+ needs to do something massively new that addresses a consumer pain point (which it doesn’t – at least not yet), or Facebook needs to make a massive blunder that drives people away (for example, around privacy, which I don’t think most users really care about). Overcoming this is even harder for Google, largely because it’s viewed by most as a utility, not a place to facilitate stronger online connections / community.
That said, there are a few things I’ll be watching as Google+ moves ahead in the short term:
Influencers – The people who are using Google+ now (the single digits mentioned above) are industry influencers / luminaries / connectors. They’re using it as a less restricted version of Twitter, because Google+ can share longer, deeper messages than 140 characters will allow. I’ll be curious to see if there’s a migration of these folks from Twitter to Google+. I tend to doubt it, however.
Business pages – Google has encouraged businesses and brands to sit on the sidelines until they release business pages as part of Google+ later this year. These are akin to “fan pages” on Facebook. If these solve a new consumer problem, then they could trigger some migration. But, again, I attach low odds to this possibility.
Search impact – The most convincing argument for embracing Google+ is its potential impact on search. It’s too early to say, but there is speculation that Google will tune its search algorithms to overweight those who “perform” well with Google+. For example, if a brand gets lots of +1’s (Google’s version of the “like” button), then that brand’s share of search volume could be dramatically increased to encourage broader adoption of content providers. This is something I’ll be evaluating after business pages launch, which should take place before the end of the year.
There is no question that the crew at Google is brilliant. And they will clearly be looking to improve their service for consumers and make it relevant as a premier social operating system for the Web. But what I will be watching is whether they can solve these core issues to make it a must-have for consumers. And, if they do, then it will become a must-have for publishers as well.
A few months ago, Ken Doctor wrote about the cost of a story, highlighting that financial pressures in media require new formulas to lower content costs. But my takeaway was different: that the greater leverage point for media success is not in reducing cost, but in increasing value.
And the hard truth is that each and every story has to pull its own weight on the new social Web these days. Demand for media now comes for the item, not for a bundle.
That said, social networks – led primarily by Facebook and Twitter – provide publishers with increased transparency about what readers consume, interact with, and share; all in real-time.
This makes publishing easier and less expensive, hence more profitable, because editors know exactly what their readers want to consume, and they don’t have to waste time, effort and resources creating content that simply won’t resonate.
To put it a different way: imagine that you have a magazine, and it’s blank. The first page, the home page, might serve as a table of contents. Then, as you click and read along, each page gets filled in – based on what you read on the previous page; the depth to which you read the previous page; and the amount of real-time sharing that you participated in on the previous page. The next page becomes an instant predictive reflection of the prior set of interest signals. This “Magic Magazine” is assembled just for you, and its content is based on your implicit explicit preferences.
I believe that we’re headed in this direction, and we’ll get there, sooner than you might think.
In fact, it’s already beginning. AOL’s Editions product invites each user to thumbs-up and thumbs-down the various topics and sources it shows, resulting in a Pandora-like experience that self-tunes, so that today’s magazine is even more personally relevant to each user than yesterday’s.
And that has the potential to make a more efficient content economy, to the extent publishers can invest in the right content and get it to all the right people.
To do that, publishers must collect all those valuable signals from the audience – which naturally means connecting on the social Web. The social Web provides robust real-time signals about exactly who the audience is, and what they want. That’s why, at Wetpaint, we’re maniacally focused on writing our playbook to master this best. Right now, we derive more than 12% of our visits from Facebook and Twitter, which ranks us #4 when compared to the 50 largest Web publishers. And we expect that figure to double or more over the next 12 months. (In fact, we’ve been increasing our Facebook traffic by 11% per month.) We’re benefiting from more than traffic: the value of each visitor is going up as well, with social visitors coming more frequently and staying longer.
It’s because our social focus lets us serve customers better. Looking ahead, we’re moving in the direction of hyper-personalization, with customized experiences that seamlessly make themselves felt.
You can see this, to some degree, on the Huffington Post today. They pioneered social channels based on what’s hot, and what’s being shared, and then they reorganized their own pages and published in real-time in order to flow into this.
Old-line media players must adapt here, and in a hurry. From my perspective, Forbes, under Lewis D’Vorkin, is way out front and doing an excellent job showing the way.
With all that programming, what about serendipity? It will still be there. But if a publisher can provide 90% of what a consumer needs and wants, that’s a big value add – especially if the remaining 10% is all the stuff the customer doesn’t know they want yet.
Over the next two years, as social media is continuously refined in new and previously unimaginable ways, I believe that the value of individual stories will keep rising.
And, if we focus on the economics of it, the value of a story online can be thought of as an equation: Page Views x RPM.
But the mathematical symbols in this case are directly representative of two really basic things – how much audience the story attracts, and how desirable the publisher’s full offering is to advertisers.
The roots of both of those are in the content; great content increases both dramatically – albeit over time (The truth is: it takes years of repeat!). And, when we peer out across the long-term horizon, it’s clear that great content that increases audience increases overall reach; and this, in turn, has the compound effect of increasing the desirability to advertisers even more.
My strong sense is that publishers of both old and new media can definitely take advantage of this all-important dynamic by closely watching and assessing the way their consumers interact with content on a real-time basis. In the end, the process should be interesting – and profitable.
As I have shared previously, our goal at Wetpaint is to be the leader in building media properties on the social Web. That’s because I am seeing the web’s nature fundamentally change to become fully social. 
It’s not just theory – it’s data.
As I shared recently at AllThingsD.com, the social Web is capturing a dramatically increasing share of users’ attention – with internet users collectively increasing the amount of time they spend per month on Facebook by 69% over a one-year period – while usage for the entire rest of the Web, excluding Facebook, shrank by 9% over the same period.
Social is the most strategic medium for our industry. And yet we haven’t established how to track our collective progress.
So, I’d like to introduce to you the first industry effort to do so. I’ve released it this week, so that we can all compare ourselves with other top publishers and see our individual and collective progress.
Below you’ll find the “Media Industry Social Leaderboard”, a scoreboard and chart that was developed by tabulating the top 50 media publishers, based on monthly unique visitors, and then determining which were best at generating traffic from Facebook and Twitter. Of course, I’ve included Wetpaint Entertainment on the list because we are so committed to social that we are going to make our progress public. (And it doesn’t hurt that we are already significantly better at reaching audiences on these two key social platforms than many major media brands such as The New York Times, The Huffington Post, CNN, Fox News, TMZ and others. My mother should finally be proud!)
This Month’s Findings
This month, we found that MTV’s website leads the pack with 14.3% of its traffic from Facebook and Twitter, indicating the shareability of their content (especially video, which is inherently more viral), and the heavily socialized audience they serve – not to mention their great execution. In fact, MTV beat average performance by a factor of two, and were one of only four out of the top 50 that were in the double digits. Sadly, over half of the Web’s top 50 had less than 4% of their traffic from social, making them menial performers on the medium.
Social Success Could Triple Your Audience’s Value
Lest you think that MTV’s 14.3% is anything to sneeze at, we dug a bit deeper to look at the true value of social. Beyond the boost to audience attraction, we also looked at audience retention. Measuring the visit frequency to each of the publishers (excluding the portals), we found a striking correlation to their sociability. The performers above median in social saw an average of more than five times as many “addicts” (visitors who come 30+ times per month) as a proportion of their audience, according to data from Quantcast, compared to those below the median; and they saw a corresponding reduction in their “passers-by” (visitors who come only once) by 16 percentage points. These patterns map overall into more than three times the visit frequency per audience member overall for these top performers. That’s three times the value per unique.
A Leading Indicator of Long-Term Success
One thing is clear from the growth trends of the social web: Those publishers that figure out how to capture and maintain a leadership position in social will win over the next decade. For Wetpaint, it’s a critical strategy for us to be a leader among the media industry. Which would make my mother very proud.
Speaking of which, in this debut month, my company Wetpaint came in #4, bested only by MTV, People, and ESPN. Not bad for a debut… we’ll be #1 within six months.
For those interested, detailed rankings of all Top 50 are included below.
| Rank | Name of Publisher (Owner) | URL | Monthly Uniques | % from Social |
| 1 | MTV | mtv.com | 17,101,841 | 14.3% |
| 2 | ESPN | espn.com | 33,242,207 | 13.7% |
| 3 | People | people.com | 12,671,101 | 13.2% |
| 4 | Wetpaint Entertainment | wetpaint.com | 2,532,044 | 12.4% |
| 5 | TMZ | tmz.com | 14,575,713 | 8.8% |
| 6 | Yahoo | yahoo.com | 172,269,418 | 8.6% |
| 7 | Patch (Aol) | patch.com | 10,610,327 | 8.6% |
| 8 | Major League Baseball | mlb.com | 15,552,415 | 7.9% |
| 9 | Aol | aol.com | 51,659,415 | 7.7% |
| 10 | Discovery Channel | discovery.com | 11,170,738 | 6.7% |
| 11 | Break Media | break.com | 9,166,220 | 6.3% |
| 12 | IGN (News Corp) | ign.com | 10,112,530 | 6.1% |
| 13 | Us Weekly | usmagazine.com | 10,970,162 | 5.9% |
| 14 | CNN | cnn.com | 56,595,377 | 5.3% |
| 15 | FOX News (News Corp) | foxnews.com | 26,900,038 | 5.0% |
| 16 | BBC News | bbc.co.uk | 14,863,384 | 4.8% |
| 17 | MSN | msn.com | 115,933,138 | 4.6% |
| 18 | Nickelodeon (MTV Networks) | nick.com | 10,716,354 | 4.6% |
| 19 | The New York Times | nytimes.com | 33,034,269 | 4.4% |
| 20 | MailOnline | dailymail.co.uk | 15,747,179 | 4.4% |
| 21 | IMDB (Amazon.com) | imdb.com | 39,778,499 | 4.4% |
| 22 | CBS Local | cbslocal.com | 11,039,512 | 4.4% |
| 23 | TIME | time.com | 10,024,132 | 4.2% |
| 24 | Cartoon Network (Turner) | cartoonnetwork.com | 10,794,764 | 4.2% |
| 25 | The Washington Post | washingtonpost.com | 17,818,260 | 4.1% |
| 26 | New York Daily News | nydailynews.com | 9,931,052 | 3.9% |
| 27 | The Guardian | guardian.co.uk | 10,283,648 | 3.8% |
| 28 | CBS News | cbsnews.com | 12,144,917 | 3.7% |
| 29 | Food Networks (Scripps) | foodnetwork.com | 14,324,933 | 3.5% |
| 30 | Allrecipes (Readers Digest) | allrecipes.com | 17,986,031 | 3.4% |
| 31 | The Huffington Post | huffingtonpost.com | 36,701,275 | 3.3% |
| 32 | TODAY / MSN (NBC/Microsoft) | today.com | 23,323,684 | 3.3% |
| 33 | Los Angeles Times (Tribune) | latimes.com | 18,618,265 | 3.2% |
| 34 | WebMD | webmd.com | 12,048,444 | 2.6% |
| 35 | The Wall Street Journal | wsj.com | 16,643,499 | 2.5% |
| 36 | Forbes | forbes.com | 12,356,124 | 2.4% |
| 37 | FOX Sports | foxsports.com | 18,346,185 | 2.2% |
| 38 | USA Today / Gannett | usatoday.com | 16,979,964 | 2.2% |
| 39 | Reuters | reuters.com | 12,726,776 | 2.2% |
| 40 | ABC News | abcnews.com | 19,876,129 | 2.1% |
| 41 | CNET (CBS Interactive) | cnet.com | 27,602,379 | 2.1% |
| 42 | Sports Illustrated (Time Inc.) | si.com | 9,304,012 | 2.1% |
| 43 | LIVESTRONG / (Demand Media) | livestrong.com | 9,650,128 | 2.0% |
| 44 | MSNBC Digital Network | msnbc.com | 44,198,985 | 1.9% |
| 45 | About.com / NY Times | about.com | 36,978,618 | 1.4% |
| 46 | Bloomberg | bloomberg.com | 10,592,480 | 1.4% |
| 47 | Mayo Clinic | mayoclinic.com | 10,944,436 | 1.1% |
| 48 | eHow (Demand Media) | ehow.com | 48,624,976 | 1.0% |
| 49 | ThePostGame | thepostgame.com | 12,017,913 | 0.9% |
| 50 | CNN Money | cnnmoney.com | 16,643,785 | N/A |
Source: Wetpaint.com analysis, comScore, Compete.com.
This article originally appeared as a feature at AllThingsD.
We all read the statistics every week documenting the meteoric new growth areas of the Internet, and they are impressive:
Online video is exploding, with annual user growth of more than 45 percent. Mobile-device time spent increased 28 percent last year – with average smart-phone time spent doubling. And social networks are now used by 90 percent of U.S. Internet users – for an average of more than four hours a month.
None of this is a newsflash. Every venture capitalist, Web publisher, and digital marketer is hyper-aware of these three trends.
But what’s happening to the rest of the Web?
When you take these three growth areas out of the picture, the size of the hole left behind is staggering: the rest of the Web – the tried and true core that we thought would have limitless growth – is already shrinking.
Here are the facts:
When you exclude just Facebook from the rest of the Web, consumption in terms of minutes of use shrank by nearly nine percent between March 2010 and March 2011, according to data from comScore. And, even when you include Facebook usage, total non-mobile Internet consumption still dropped three percent over the same period.
We’ve known that social is growing lightning fast – notably, Facebook consumption, which grew by 69 percent; but now it’s clear that Facebook is not growing in addition to the Web. Rather, it’s actually taking consumption away from the publishers who compete on the rest of the Web.
And just what is the rest of the Web?
I have been calling it the “document Web,” based on how Google and other Web architectures view its pages as documents, linked together. But increasingly, it might as well be called the “searchable Web” since it’s accessed predominantly as a reference, and navigated primarily via search.
And it’s becoming less relevant.
In the last year, Facebook’s share of users’ time online grew from one out of every 13 minutes of use nationwide, to one out of every eight. In aggregate, that means the document Web was down more than half a billion hours of use (that’s more than 800 lifetimes) this March versus last March. And in financial terms, that represents a lost opportunity of $2.2 billion in advertising inventory that didn’t exist this year.
The Creation of a New, Connected Web
The change in the Web’s direction is a clear indication to me that we aren’t just in the midst of a boom for new interaction modes, but rather a generational overhaul of the Internet.
What replaces the declining searchable Web is a new and “fully connected” digital life. You may have heard this before. After all, the promise of the Web was to connect pages with hyperlinks. Well, this time, “connected” means much more. It means the Web connects us, as people, to each one of the individuals who’s online; and those connections, ultimately, extend from one of us to all of us.
Just as significantly, this all happens in real-time, and at nearly all times.
And here’s what’s different when you connect people, as opposed to pages: Now, the Web knows who we are (identity); is with us at all times wherever we go (mobile); threads our relationships with others (social); and delivers meaningful experiences beyond just text and graphics (video).
The connected, social Web is alive, moving, proactive, and personal; while the document Web is just an artifact – suited as a universal reference, but hardly a personal experience.
The Social Web Versus the Searchable Web
Analytical explanations – increasing smart-phone penetration, bandwidth availability, and technology sophistication – fill in some of the gaps as we try to understand this sea change, but they fall short.
Something larger is afoot, and it’s not about science or technology. Rather, as human beings, we have changed how we fit the Internet into our lives.
And the nature of the Web is changing to match. The old searchable Web is crashing; while the new connected, social Web is lifting off.
The implications for publishers are massive.
The last decade has been defined by the rise of Google as the nearly limitless supplier of traffic to digital media properties. And so a generation of digital media publishers developed and followed the same playbook: create lots of content around top keywords; engineer for search engine optimization (SEO); and expand the surface area in search engines to reach more users. The objective was to catch visitors in their net; expand reach – as measured by ComScore; look more impressive to advertisers; and capture more demand.
The landscape is changing, and fast.
SEO’s strategic value is quickly fading as Google’s growth slows and its prominence in distribution slides away. In its place, Facebook has become the wiring hub of the connected Web – a new “home base” alternative to Google’s dominance of the last decade. Facebook began receiving as many visits as Google in March 2010, and already garners more than three times as many minutes as Google each month from users, according to comScore. Looking ahead, the best projections of U.S. online reach indicate that Facebook will surpass Google on that metric in less than a year, too.
And with this change, the nature of the relationship between users and publishers is being altered fundamentally – and perhaps forever.
Search offers a utility relationship, connecting users to content for the briefest of transactions; typically, it provokes users to just one page-view so they can find a piece of information, and then they move on.
But social discovery builds a relationship. Leveraging social endorsements and an environment of serendipitous discovery, consumers meet publishers in a meaningful context. As a result, the relationship that forms is stronger – and, more importantly for publishers, it’s branded.
Unlike the ecosystem set up by Google, where the search engine ironically intermediates between users and the objects of their queries (so that users reinforce their loyalty to Google, far more than to the publisher), in the world of social publishing, the Facebook hub enables a direct, if constrained, relationship between users and media brands.
The results – at least for my own company, Wetpaint – are that social media brings more qualified eyeballs and retains them. People who come via social media stay longer on the first visit; and they are more likely to come back sooner and more frequently. Overall, our visitors from social networks have a relationship that’s several times stronger – and several times as valuable when measured in engagement, page-views, and revenues – than the relationships people form when then arrive through search.
The Human Connection
But it’s not just a change in mechanics. It’s a change in our human relationships.
Lewis D’Vorkin, the Chief Product Officer at Forbes, speaks of it when he and Alex Knapp talk about “live” media, quantum entanglement and mutually rewarding relationships that bind authors and readers on the new connected Web. It’s a sense of the Web moving from static published reference to living digital companion.
But there’s even more, and this vast change foreshadows bigger and better impacts on our lives. The greatest innovators in social media are driving along exactly that edge today. As one friend commented recently on the full potential of connected lives, by being joined more closely together, we can increase empathy and meaning, while decreasing isolation.
Toward a Fully Connected Future
Admittedly, we’re early in the replacement cycle when it comes to the connected Web. Even for strong connected Web performers like Huffington Post, my own company, Wetpaint, and others, the sum total of traffic from Facebook, Twitter, video, and mobile may add up to only half the total, or less.
But the trend has tipped; and with that tip has come both the business necessity and the human impact potential of elevating the relationship.
As the document Web of old shrinks, the new connected Web expands and delivers experiences that make our time online more effective, efficient, and enjoyable.
And that changes the role of companies on the Web from mere content publishers or providers to truly connected digital partners for real people.
We need an experience revolution.
Each week, we hear of major publications and traditional broadcasters who are struggling to stay afloat in a digital age with new economics and new expectations. Despite the promise of interactivity made with the internet revolution over the last 15 years, most publishers have done little more than replicate dead trees online, with zero innovation beyond the hyperlink, the slideshow, and an embedded video now and then.
And yet we can see from the rising successes of the last decade like Facebook, Google, Zynga, YouTube, and others that what catches audience attention is interactivity.
To earn loyal audiences today, publishers need to go beyond content creation: they need to produce compelling experiences that distinguish them and get the consumer coming back for more. The Pew Internet & American Life Project concluded that “when asked whether they have a favorite online news source, the majority of online news users (65%) say they do not.” In an era where the consumer’s cost to switch is the flick of a click, publishers must offer compelling, differentiated experiences to earn loyalty. Choices abound consumers: there are scads of publishers online in every category; content suggestions offered constantly via social networks; and blue links proffered by search engines dozens of times per day per reader. In an environment of choice, as brand experts have known for years, nothing builds loyalty like a great experience.
And now is the perfect time to create those breakthrough experiences. The enabling technologies for the digital customer experience have improved considerably in recent years: we now have ubiquitous broadband, flash and other streaming video, plus HTML5 and maturing mobile application platforms. Add to that personalization, targeting and social graph access, and there are some amazing opportunities to innovate.
It’s not just consumers that are thirsty for upgraded experiences. Advertisers are showing that they will pay more for immersive interaction over basic display ads next to text. Video ads during full TV episodes on ABC.com, Hulu, and others, or mid-day live sporting broadcasts command many times the CPM of typical display ads. Indeed, according to Michael Learmonth at AdAge, The Wall Street Journal’s online video content is bringing in envy-inspiring CPMs at $75 – $100.
But video is not the only way to create an immersive customer experience online. Online sites of traditional publishers like Better Homes and Gardens are experience train wrecks (to be fair, they’re not alone in that regard). Contrast that with the much more successful (certainly from an ad rate perspective) MarthaStewart.com which has many of the same elements – a top stories slideshow, cross-promotions for the print magazine, etc., and it’s a substantially better experience due to the focus on design and usability that is expected of the Martha Stewart Omnimedia (MSO) brand.
Even still, much more can be done with today’s technology to put the consumer’s needs and interests first. The latest example I’ve seen of true creativity in user experience design is Microsoft’s (MSFT) Glo. There are additional signs of greatness in the tablet demo that Time Warner (TWX) built for its Sports Illustrated brand. And The New York Times (NYT) continues to excel in their applications and interactive graphics which enjoy significant pass around (bit.ly shows over 5,000 social media clicks to a recent budget infographic and today’s “A Moment in Time” project has already generated over 100 tweets in the first 15 hours). But too few companies are making similar efforts to distinguish themselves. The opportunities are there, and we need to step up.
Consumers will decide which brands deserve their loyalty and content alone won’t cut it. We are on the brink of a total revolution of experience. For publishers, it’s reinvent or fail.
Do you know additional examples of publishers innovating?
Copyright ®2011 - Digital Quarters – Ben Elowitz - Log in
Powered by WordPress | Evidens [White] Theme by Design Disease for PremiumThemes.com