Over the last several weeks, I’ve heard executives from News Corp, Yahoo, and AOL who all share one thing on their minds: they are loco for local. And they all have the same local challenge: howto get their hands on content all over the map, without having to pay through the nose.
The problem with local publishing is that while strategic interest from the media companies is high, audiences are sub-scale, and monetization is just starting to pay off. Publishers can’t afford a big investment in a traditional staff for individual online markets that may not be able to afford even a dedicated writer.
Enter creativity. Just because you can’t pay big bucks doesn’t mean you can’t make a great employment proposition. The Huffington Post, always happy to defy traditional rules, is taking a bold approach. Their entry into local markets via college workforces offers a number of great ideas in sourcing talent and content in new, creative ways that can attract great contributions who don’t fit the old mold.
Bundling enough of these benefits together makes this compelling for students to invest themselves into. And for HuffPo, all of these offerings are high value/low cost, so they are affordable.
Who will this idea inspire? I’d love to see some of the more traditional publishing houses and newspapers follow suit with their own creative approach to local.
Charles Pelton, the former GM of Conferences and Events at the Washington Post, wrote a piece for PaidContent this week raising opportunities for journalists to create new revenue streams beyond traditional advertising. His message is important, and gives hope to journalists by reframing our opportunity to redefine the publishing industry.
Journalists are understandably fearful of the shakiness of the industry right now: 15,000 employees in the newspaper sector lost their jobs last year, and Silicon Alley Insider just published this dramatic chart of the day showing the steep cliff we are on.
But while Pelton mourns the loss of jobs, he also offers solutions, and they align with where the industry needs to head:
The point is to take the journalist’s knowledge, and package and present analysis in new, interesting and useful ways for paying audiences. In this case, there’s a subset of readers (IT vendors, for instance) who would pay a premium for insight about technology use by government…. Could a film critic or arts editor moderate a readers’ discussion—live or virtual, about a new movie—something actually sponsored by AMC Theaters? You bet!
Indeed, product development should be part of a journalist’s job. Journalists should be working side by side with their business-side colleagues to create and monetize products—and should be evaluated, in part, on their ability to do just that.
These are great examples. Underneath them, they illustrate three things that need to happen for the media world to rise again to a new, profitable model:
These are not new themes. Top journalists like Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg have been incredibly successful extending their skills and brands from journalism to a broader role in industry, running the Wall Street Journal’s D: All Things Digital conference since 2003. Another role model, Thomas Friedman of the New York Times has leveraged his journalism role into multiple books that have had a huge commercial impact. These journalists demonstrate that it can be done – while preserving top-tier journalistic integrity.
It’s not a brand new idea, but what we need now is to see it become a widespread idea. It’s time for those who write to go beyond the creation of words to the creation of results.