I’ve been quiet on my blog recently, which – as you may have guessed — is an indicator that I’ve been particularly busy.
Over the last several months, I’ve been out talking with leading media industry executives about the challenge we face in making digital media as successful as its analog predecessor. We can all name the roots of the challenge: the explosion of supply online, and the ease with which consumers can move from one property to another. We are now living with the results, including an extraordinary number of websites for users to choose from, and a challenge for publishers in getting and holding consumers’ attention and advertisers’ dollars.
While I’ve been on the road, 35 smart and talented people at Wetpaint have been working to address these challenges head-on: by inventing a new business model for digital media. A new model that uses technology in the most disruptive way at the core of the publishing business. Beyond just taking friction out of the workflow, my team has designed new advantages that can reduce the costs of content creation and audience recruitment by a factor of 5-10X vs. benchmark publishers, all while offering greater appeal to consumers and advertisers alike.
This weekend, we launched the first version of our publishing platform, with our first media property built on it: Wetpaint Entertainment. For consumers, it’s a breakthrough user experience – full of glossy photos, fun and interactive, and social to the core. For advertisers, it’s a rich, engaging, and premium context in which to reach core target audiences – the same audiences, in fact, that they already target with network TV buys.
But for the 35 of us at Wetpaint, it is far more: it is our first milestone in our mission to revolutionize media.
An audacious goal, isn’t it? Let me explain.
What Will Leading Media Properties Look Like?
In the four years since we launched Wetpaint, we’ve seen plenty of innovation in digital media. User-generated content, video, and social media have all risen from small fancies to widespread prominence. Meanwhile, we’ve experienced the rise of content distributors, such as Google, Facebook, and Huffington Post, to unexpected levels of audience and influence. But all the while, the precious core segments of the publishing industry – news and magazine publishing – have been suffering layoffs, closures, and an increasing sense of irrelevance under the pressures of the new digital playing field and amidst dwindling audience and advertiser interest in their brands. And with the specter of doom around the corner, no one has come up with a true replacement for their withering business model.
The question for us as an industry is (with a nod to Tim Armstrong, the CEO of Aol, for phrasing it): Who is going to be the Time Inc. or Conde Nast of the digital future? And, more importantly, how?
The answer is not so-called content farms, such as Associated Content or Demand Media. Content farms may be a valuable tactical business, but they do not produce leadership, loyalty, or destinations – much less brand premiums. Nor is the answer Facebook or Flipboard or Twitter. They are great conduits for content and attention, but they rely on content creation happening elsewhere – with few exceptions, the best they can do is surface what’s created on other platforms.
The answer is that the next generation of publishers must still create quality content – but they have to create it far more cheaply, or their business model won’t work. The editor-intensive newsrooms of The New York Times and Time Inc. are not models for a digital future; but neither is the Huffington Post, with its heavy reliance on an unpaid squad of volunteers in far-flung places.
The new leader will be defined by three key advantages:
When these three strategies perform in tandem, one can uniquely publish with high velocity, low cost, outstanding reach, and most importantly, earning huge consumer loyalty – all of which accrues not only to the metrics on a spreadsheet that indicate a healthy business, but more importantly to a brand premium that builds results year after year.
A Platform With Which To Create Leading Titles
And if a publisher were to possess a platform that can repeatably produce such titles, they would have golden egg after golden egg in the form of media titles that can serve one audience after the next.
Today we launch the new Wetpaint Entertainment, operating on our first iteration of such a platform. Our new platform is built on the idea that we can use technology and data from this morning to influence what we write this afternoon. That the editorial art can be informed by data science. And that with the fundamental changes of the last five years, we now have an environment abundant in data to inform what content will suit an audience – and empower publishers to write the content that audiences love, without chasing the red herring of ideas that sound good but won’t produce results.
While all that horsepower is brewing under the hood, what our audience will see is far simpler: whether on Facebook, on the web, or on an iPad, they’ll experience a beautiful site that entices them with rich visual imagery, fun experiences, and the most appealing content that completes their relationship with their favorite TV shows.
Today is the first milestone for Wetpaint toward a vision of revolutionizing media – for consumers and for the industry. Please, come visit and enjoy.
It’s been a week of dancing for Apple and The New York Times as they played hokey pokey with an app that offers a new, fun way for consumers to experience media: First, Steve Jobs put the acclaimed Pulse News app into his Worldwide Developers Conference talk, then took it out of the app store, and then put it back in again, but only after the developers took The New York Times out of it.
But as fun as it is to watch them dance, I can’t help but notice that The New York Times missed the opportunity right in front of Sr. VP Martin Nisenholtz’s eyes: the Pulse team is exactly the kind of talent that the company should be acquiring, not shunting. The Pulse founders made an app with a great consumer experience for media, did it in just a few weeks, managed to get the attention of the premier technology tastemaker in the world, Steve Jobs, and even made some money.
Message to Martin: Instead of cutting them down and pushing them into someone else’s arms, make nice and go hire (or acquire) the Pulse team. Or, as my mother once said to my older brother when he was dating someone she actually liked, “There are better men out there than you: You better marry her before someone else does!”
Last month, I wrote a post titled “Associated Content is Yahoo’s First Big Media Move. Here’s What Should Come Next,” in which I pushed Yahoo to acquire premium content properties to overcome the commodity signal they sent by acquiring AC. I said at the time that Huffington Post’s curation model “crowdsources content but applies a strong point of view and features premier branded names, lifting it above the commodity fold.” For Yahoo, Huffington Post is the perfect combination of premium and economical.
Now, over this last weekend, Erick Schonfeld wrote at TechCrunch that deal discussions between these two publishers are underway for a content partnership or outright acquisition. Though Arianna Huffington denies it, other sources indicate that HuffPo has been on Yahoo’s short list, and I wouldn’t be surprised if conversations have been ongoing.
While Yahoo had previously announced intentions to compete in news by hiring brand-name reporters, that direction is fraught for the big portal: the news category is difficult to lead with a heavy demand on consistently breaking news — and it would take years for Yahoo to build the credibility in original reporting to become a true audience magnet. And the prize for winning even if they do? It could be losses, not profits, as has been born out by the experience of myriad old media outlets who are now making over their businesses.
What Huffington Post represents is a far better road for Yahoo to go from portal to destination in a realistic way. HuffPo can draw audiences not by competing with the news outlets on reporting but with great access and point of view – both of which are within Yahoo’s brand and execution reach. It would serve as an anchor property with true destination draw.
Indeed, Huffington Post may be unique among the news-oriented sites of the portals, curators, and aggregators in having earned true premium positioning. They did so by emphasizing a strong and reliable point of view along with affiliation with notable brands (such as regulars Arianna Huffington herself, Bill Maher, Harry Shearer, and Rosie O’Donnell, along with guest posts from a robust range of influentials). Along the way, the site has also earned an outstanding brand and destination audience of 22 million (comScore), consistently garnering visits from both search engine referrals (14% of traffic from Google according to compete.com) and social networks (16% from Facebook).
This destination draw is critical for Yahoo. At Yahoo’s home page, 73% of monthly viewers are there to get their mail – and that usage is shrinking at (2%) per year (comscore April 2010 vs. April 2009) vs. a US internet universe which grew at 10%. As Yahoo commits to a media-company destiny, its strategy must be to create high-end destination titles that will draw premium advertising – not just keep mail users on-network longer.
For those in charge of Yahoo’s media properties, David Ko and Jimmy Pitaro, they would get two other benefits to leverage: HuffPo gives Yahoo a premium curation model prototype for it to replicate; and a DNA transplant to bring in the talent and experience to scale that model.
As far as the first, Huffington Post has shown itself to be the best of the curators, establishing a strong point of view that draws a huge audience with near-zero cost for original content. And the model – the fame and traffic of Huffington Post beget contribution from interesting people, which drives more fame and traffic for Huffington Post’s brand – is replicable in other categories, as HuffPo has shown with its entertainment category rumored to already reach an audience of 10 million monthly, according to internal measurements. This is the sort of model that Yahoo should be banking on, as commodity content alone will never make Yahoo a premier media company.
Perhaps more importantly, there is nothing to catalyze the adoption of a new direction like bringing on a talented and effective crew. An acquisition of Huffington Post brings not just a branded destination, but a whole crew of operators with a scarce and effective set of skill, approach, and attitudes. Those genetic elements are exactly what Yahoo needs to quickly set a new approach to existing properties with large audiences, such as entertainment, shine, and omg!, as well as to each new title launched.
All in all, an acquisition of Huffington Post would form the perfect foundation for Yahoo’s new ambitions as a premier media destination – and would be well worth the several hundred million dollars it would surely cost to set a bold and profitable strategy for Yahoo to be a premier media company.
What’s the point of developing a great brand if you don’t take advantage of it? In the consumer products industry, the norm is to develop a great brand, then perform line extensions. Crest lends its name to Crest White Strips so consumers will trust them more. Disney’s trademarked princesses adorn adhesive bandages to spur kids to cover imaginary wounds; and Ralph Lauren finds his way into the paint aisle of Home Depot so I can be sure my new wall colors will be fashionable.
But these sorts of licensing and line extension deals have been more scarce in publishing. And it’s great to see that change.
According to reports from Russell Adams at The Wall Street Journal, bucking its historical resistance, Glamour has decided to seek more revenue by leveraging its brand into new product lines by partnering with IAC’s Match.com for the Glamour Matchmaker dating site, with IAC’s HSN on a new jewelry line, and with Like.com for an “Ask The Stylist“ app.
This is great news, and it bucks the recent countertrend in publishing of focusing on reducing costs. While others have been seduced by the allure of commodity content, Conde Nast is instead increasing its commitment to its premium brand. That’s the right move. For the leaders in digital media, their future success will be far better served by increasing the value of their premium brands and destinations — and by leveraging that value into new territory. Smart partnerships not only create more revenues, but also create broader reach for their brands and the opportunity to move beyond serving as just titles of published properties into more meaningful sector or lifestyle brands. And that means developing long-term deep relationships with consumers — which will be even more valuable in then feeding back into premium advertising rates based on increased reach and goodwill. It’s a formula that companies like Disney have mastered, with original content, experiences, and licensed products virtuously cycling to create more and more value.
For publishers like Conde Nast, now is a great time to set their brands free to do more. As a premium publisher, they invest in creating outstanding, differentiating content and experiences for their audiences. And they are doing a benefit to their consumers by extending their credentials to other categories.
My bet: Over the next 12 months, we’ll see other publishers following Conde Nast’s lead.
Among all the major categories of premium digital media, political news may be the toughest to make money on. It’s incredibly fragmented; it has no endemic advertisers; the content is often unpredictable, sensitive and/or polarizing; and it relies highly on original reporting, making it especially costly to produce.
With all those black marks that make it both especially difficult and especially rewarding, it’s refreshing to see MSNBC take up the experience revolution challenge: According to Mike Shields at Media Week, MSNBC is talking with BermanBraun about launching a new politics site with an out-of-the-box concept.
Based on the innovative work they’ve done for MSN’s Glo and Wonderwall, it’s a safe bet that if BermanBraun takes on the case, politics won’t look the same after this makeover as it did before.
And that’s a good thing. We know the old model is increasingly challenged to stay afloat. So we need someone in the industry to take some big risks and try their hand at a new approach to the category – which will hopefully not only increase engagement, but monetization.
While I don’t expect that this will significantly replace any of the existing and valuable political coverage out there today, it does have the potential to inspire other news publishers to revolutionize their own experience for consumers – which is exactly what’s necessary to improve the health of their business.
After studying how top brands engage their consumers and outperform in key financial measures in the interactive EngagementDB report we co-authored with Charlene Li’s Altimeter Group last year (PDF available), CNBC asked me last week to put together a list of the top brands who are doing the most with Twitter… and getting the best results.
I sent my picks over and they put together this nifty slideshow.
The key to the success of every one of these brands is using Twitter as a grapevine for 2-way publishing: they amplify their (short but sweet!) messages and promotions to their consumers, and listen to what their consumers have to say. It’s working. These companies are scoring big revenue and loyalty wins with their customers.
The following post appeared as a guest post at Mediapost on February 25, 2010.
A couple of weeks ago, I was privileged to be a guest for a breakfast with Valerie Jarrett, senior advisor and confidant to President Obama, while she was traveling through the Seattle area. Planning for her travel, Ms. Jarrett’s staff proactively reached out to Northwest executives and organizations to meet and discuss our challenges and ideas.
And Valerie did something remarkable: She listened. Her breakfast offered an important lesson for those of us in the media industry whose job is primarily around broadcasting our message to the masses: to listen truly and deeply to reality as it is, rather than how we want it to be.
On dozens of different topics, Valerie Jarrett took in every word, whether it came from supporter or critic. She demonstrated (in a perception-is-reality sort of way) that every voice she heard was bringing her not only perspective, but potential solutions. She pressed each opinion to understand it and to ask — directly — for the best ideas. She demonstrated she was taking those proposals to heart, and moreso, and taking them back with her to the White House to do the most important thing – take action.
The challenges facing the Obama administration are great: the fatigued healthcare initiative; the burden of extreme deficits; and a public that has been increasingly losing faith their change agent. And after seeing this inner-circle advisor open her eyes, ears, and arms to criticisms and solutions, I walked away inspired with the sense that they have a good shot of figuring it out.
And acting. The thing with listening is that it’s only useful if you actually do something with it — and she did. A favorite example from the morning: When Ken Myer offered an idea for the White House to host a robotics competition on the south lawn as a symbol of the importance of science education, Ms. Jarrett said right on the spot that she’ll make it happen.
Back in the media industry, how many executives make the time to meet with our constituents — both our supporters and our critics — just to hear what’s on their minds? Even moreso, how many of us really listen when we have the chance? What impressed me most about Valerie Jarrett was that whether they flattered her positions or not, she wanted to hear reality from every perspective, and embrace solutions.
Too often in our changing media industry, leaders aren’t facing the brutal facts, much less acting on them. We are facing rapid shifts in the way content is consumed and what advertisers want for their dollar. And what many publishers are doing is the opposite of action: it is hiding.
There is hope. I loved reading Kara Swisher’s account of how Carol Bartz hosted her most vocal critic in the company cafeteria to share her Yahatred openly with 600 employees. Summoning the beast to the inner sanctum was a clear statement to executives and employees to listen to their critics and hear challenging perspective, to take it seriously, and most importantly to act on it.
But at the same time, some old media companies just don’t want to hear it. I frequently see first-hand and hear stories from friends of how the biggest and oldest media companies are ignoring reality. One of the most striking examples was at last week’s breakfast. Frank Blethen, Publisher of the Seattle Times stood up and said into the microphone: “Contrary to popular belief, the newspaper business model is sound.” He might be the only person in America who thinks so. And if he does have the secret to solving the newspaper publishing mess, he must not be sharing it. But more than likely, he’s hard of hearing. Instead of openly listening for solutions to stabilize the business in the face of declining circulation, pages, and advertising, he is in denial. Too many from the biggest and oldest media companies are ignoring reality — and the results will be fatal for them.
For the future of our industry, may we be challenge ourselves to listen like Valerie Jarrett and Carol Bartz. Let’s bring in the toughest critics. Let them loose and have them take their toughest shots. For us, we can thicken our skins to take it, and be better for it. Focus on the criticism that makes us cringe, and use it to inspire new solutions. The more we see and hear reality – the more we invite it into our cafeterias for breakfast or lunch, listen to it, and ask it for ideas, the sooner we can innovate our way to success.
Simon Dumenco wrote at AdAge this week about the billionaire benefactors of old media: the Sulzbergers, Rupert Murdoch, Bruce Wasserstein, Sam Zell, John R. MacArthur, and more. He laments their aging, and in a subhead asks “where’s the next generation of Richie Riches willing to take losses on worthy media properties?”
It’s easy to take a melancholy view that the good old days of media are behind us. But “who wants to take a loss?” is the wrong question. Let’s get real: The future of media had better not be about finding philanthropists to fund it. It needs to be about creating successful businesses. Those successful businesses will create wealth, not consume it, when they deliver content and experiences that are worth paying for by advertisers and consumers alike.
So who are these emerging emperors of the digital media age so far?
Each one of these figures has created a new model that matches the digital age. And, in fact, every one of them has done it by breaking with traditional publishing to interleave content and consumption so that they are inseparable.
That interactivity of content and consumption is a defining difference between the new world of media and the falling empires of legacy publishing. Those who master the synergy between their audience and their content can transform their consumers into far more than just a target for advertising: their audience participates in building the empire itself.
(Missing anyone? Post a comment with your thoughts.)