<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Rules For Judging ‘Quality’ In Published Content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalquarters.net/2010/05/the-new-rules-for-judging-quality-in-published-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalquarters.net/2010/05/the-new-rules-for-judging-quality-in-published-content/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-new-rules-for-judging-quality-in-published-content</link>
	<description>Wetpaint CEO Ben Elowitz on the Future of Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7 ways to make SMO work in the post-Google age :: I Like Payday</title>
		<link>http://digitalquarters.net/2010/05/the-new-rules-for-judging-quality-in-published-content/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>7 ways to make SMO work in the post-Google age :: I Like Payday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalquarters.net/?p=506#comment-191</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8212; with pride &#8212; which is the emotional fuel that powers the Like button. With your audience as the judge, it&#8217;s all about the quality of what you share with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8212; with pride &#8212; which is the emotional fuel that powers the Like button. With your audience as the judge, it&#8217;s all about the quality of what you share with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Binomial Revenue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Analysis: Old Media Magazines Are Losing Their Share Online Despite Being Great Brands</title>
		<link>http://digitalquarters.net/2010/05/the-new-rules-for-judging-quality-in-published-content/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Binomial Revenue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Analysis: Old Media Magazines Are Losing Their Share Online Despite Being Great Brands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalquarters.net/?p=506#comment-102</guid>
		<description>[...] need to go further by transforming their organizations, incentives, and sources and embracing the new definitions of publishing quality to provide the experiences that consumers are now seeking online.&#160; With online share falling [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] need to go further by transforming their organizations, incentives, and sources and embracing the new definitions of publishing quality to provide the experiences that consumers are now seeking online.&nbsp; With online share falling [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

